I’m trying to run a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in R using the lavaan package, but I’m hitting a snag. Here’s what’s happening:
model <- '
# Factor definitions
Quality =~ q1 + q2 + q3 + q4
Service =~ s1 + s2 + s3 + s4
Value =~ v1 + v2 + v3 + v4
# Regressions
Satisfaction + Loyalty ~ Quality + Service + Value
Loyalty ~ Satisfaction
# Covariances
Satisfaction ~~ Loyalty
Satisfaction ~~ Quality
'
result <- cfa(model, data=survey_data)
When I run this, I get an error saying some variables are missing from my dataset. But I’m sure they’re there! I’ve double-checked the column names and everything.
I’ve also tried using sem() instead of cfa(), but no luck. Am I missing something obvious? Any ideas on how to troubleshoot this?
Oof, CFA can be a real head-scratcher sometimes, right? I feel your pain!
Have you tried running names(survey_data) to double-check all your variable names? Sometimes sneaky spaces or capitalization differences can throw things off.
Also, I’m curious - are Satisfaction and Loyalty actually in your dataset? Your model is treating them as latent variables, but they’re not defined with the =~ operator like the others. Maybe try defining them explicitly?
yo surfingWave, i’ve been there! check if ur variables are actually in the data with head(survey_data). sometimes R gets weird with case sensitivity, so make sure ur var names match exactly. also, try running the model step by step, adding one factor at a time. that way u can pinpoint where its freaking out. good luck dude!
I’ve encountered similar issues with lavaan before. One thing to check is whether all your variables are numeric. Sometimes, if a variable is stored as a factor or character, lavaan won’t recognize it properly.
Try running str(survey_data) to inspect the structure of your dataset. If any variables are non-numeric, you might need to convert them:
survey_data ← lapply(survey_data, as.numeric)
Also, ensure there are no missing values in your data. lavaan can be sensitive to NAs. You could use na.omit(survey_data) to remove rows with missing data, but be cautious as this might affect your sample size.
If these don’t solve the issue, you might want to try fitting a simpler model first (maybe just one factor) to isolate where the problem is occurring. Gradually build up to your full model, adding components one at a time.