Oppose religious instruction in public school curricula by urging the Texas State Board to vote no on adopting the Bible-centric reading program. Advocate quality and secular materials for students.
i think school curriculm should stick to fact based stuff. religion is more of a personal idea for home than school settings. it may lead to bias or indoctrination if we mix it too much.
Hey everyone, I’ve been mulling over this too! I’m kind of in a grey area on the whole debate. On one hand, religious texts have such a big influence on art, literature, and even history, so acknowledging their impact seems important. On the other hand, I get that directly including them in the curriculum might inadvertently sway students if it’s not handled carefully. It made me wonder, could there be a middle ground where we explore religion from a historical or sociological perspective without endorsing any particular viewpoint? How do you feel schools could approach this so it remains educational rather than persuasive? Would love to hear your thoughts on finding that balance! 
The inclusion of religious content in public school curricula has its merits and drawbacks. Based on my experience, I believe a balanced approach can work best. When religious themes are discussed, it should be from a cultural, literary, or historical perspective rather than a scriptural endorsement. This method helps students critically analyze the societal and historical impacts of religion without promoting any specific faith. Drawing on observed practices in several educational institutions, an emphasis on academic inquiry over religious instruction not only maintains the secular nature of public education but also enriches students’ understanding of diverse cultural narratives.