Gracie University substitutes conventional BJJ terms with altered labels, which can confuse those outside their system. Is this intentional?
Based on my own experience with Gracie University, I believe the changes in terminology are indeed deliberate and serve to create a distinctive approach. The adjustments seem intended to simplify the learning process for beginners, making it less intimidating than traditional nomenclature. In my view, while the modified terms offer clarity in instruction, it is essential for practitioners to also understand conventional terminology to appreciate the rich history and evolution of BJJ. This dual understanding can be beneficial for those who plan to train or compete across different schools.
hey, i think gracie purposely minimises traditonal terms to lower the entry barrier. sure, it might kill the true vibe a bit. for me, its a calculated move for broader appeal. not a crime though, just a twist in teachin.
Hey Luke87, I’ve been mulling this over too and it really gets me thinking. I’m wondering if Gracie University is intentionally remodeling terminology to carve out their own identity or maybe to simplify what can sometimes feel like an overwhelming traditional lexicon. It kind of makes you ask: are they trying to bridge a gap for newcomers, or is it a strategic move to emphasize a specific teaching method? It’s pretty intriguing, don’t you think? How do you feel about these changes? Would love to hear if you see it as a refreshing update or something that might blur the historical roots of BJJ. Let’s chat more about this! 
Hey all, I’ve been following the convo and find it pretty interesting how Gracie University seems to be taking an innovative path with their curriculum. It almost feels like they’re trying to modernize the BJJ learning experience, making it a bit more welcoming for newcomers while stepping away from what some might call intimidating old-school jargon. I wonder if in the long run, as students delve deeper into the art, they eventually discover the value in both sides of the coin – the streamlined approach here and the rich traditional terminology elsewhere. It makes me curious: do you think this mix of new and old could actually enrich one’s understanding of BJJ, or does it risk diluting the core traditions? I’d love to know how others see this evolving, especially from those who’ve experienced training in multiple schools. What’s your take on it?