What do you think are some unconventional views on instructional design?

I came across a post in another forum that really captured my interest with its unique take on instructional design. I’m curious to learn about any unconventional or rarely expressed opinions that you might have regarding this field or how the design process is typically managed. Please share any surprising insights or experiences that deviate from the common narrative. Your input can cover approaches, teaching strategies, or any alternative ideas that challenge mainstream practices in instructional design.

Hey all, I’ve been mulling over this idea that maybe the whole structure of instructional design could benefit from a bit more improvisation—almost like jazz. Rather than sticking to what we know works best, what if we occasionally let the learning narrative evolve naturally, following the learners’ own interests and responses? It feels like there’s real magic in designing environments where the course content and the participants can co-create the learning journey. Has anyone experimented with letting an unexpected turn in a lesson lead the way to a breakthrough moment? I’d really love to hear about any experiences where stepping away from rigid models led to deeper engagement. Cheers and keep the ideas flowing! :blush:

hey, ive seen that dropping some strict rules helps u discover intuitive teaching moments. a bit of chaos and spontaneity device can unearth real learner interest and fresh ideas.

My experience has led me to believe that instructional design thrives when it steps away from predetermined formats and instead embraces a more organic, responsive structure. I have found that allowing the course framework to evolve based on learner feedback and interaction can be particularly effective. Rather than adhering strictly to a linear progression, designing a flexible learning pathway often uncovers hidden learning opportunities and addresses individual student needs more directly. This dynamic approach transforms the instructional process into an interactive dialogue, where both educators and learners contribute to the evolving curriculum in a constructive manner.

hey, i lean twards design as a creative improv session. instead of follow the script, letting rough ideas flow can spark unexpected learner insights. it ain’t pristine but keeps things real. anyone else had similar offbeat results?