For individuals who have recently earned an online Master of Education (completed after the initial COVID shutdown), could you explain if your program was mostly asynchronous, featuring periodic readings, assignments, and occasional scheduled live sessions, or if it primarily relied on synchronous classes held at fixed times such as weekly meetings? I would appreciate any insights you can provide.
Hey there iris_92paint, I’ve got a similar story to share! I completed my online Master of Education program too and it was a fun blend of both asynchronous work and some live catch-ups. The majority of my week was spent diving into readings and submitting assignments at my own pace, which was a lifesaver when things got hectic. Still, those live sessions really helped when I needed to bounce ideas around with classmates—there’s something special about interactive chats that just emailing back and forth doesn’t replicate. How did everyone else feel about the mix? Did those live sessions add a layer of connection for you or did you find that the flexibility of asynchronous learning was enough? Let’s talk experiences and maybe share a few tips on striking the right balance 
hey iris, my program was mostly self-paced reading with a few live chats thrown in. it was chill overall despite the rough spots, and i kinda missed more live buzz sometimes. guess it all depends on your study flow!
My online Master of Education program leaned largely on asynchronous learning, allowing the flexibility I needed while juggling other responsibilities. Although the majority of the work was completed independently through readings and assignments, we had periodic live sessions that provided clarifications and a forum for deeper discussion. I found that the occasional synchronous meetings were enough to build a sense of connection without compromising the adaptability of the course. Overall, the approach facilitated self-paced learning while still incorporating elements that encouraged academic interaction and community engagement.