Are digital devices overpowering traditional classroom methods?

While substituting, I’ve noticed schools relying excessively on tablets, laptops, and smart boards, which seems to diminish hands-on learning and focus, possibly affecting effective engagement.

Over the years, I have observed that digital devices can greatly enhance educational methods if integrated properly. In environments where digital tools complement rather than override traditional methods, there is a notable boost in interactive and personalized learning. However, excessive dependence on these devices may curb the development of basic skills that evolve through direct human interaction and practical exercises. From my experience, a well-balanced approach that respects the merits of both digital and conventional methods results in a richer educational experience, maintaining engagement and fostering hands-on learning.

Hey everyone! I’ve been mulling over this too. In my view, digital devices aren’t exactly overpowering traditional methods—they’re just reshaping them. Tech can serve as an amazing bridge between static content and interactivity, you know? But there’s also something to be said for the hands-on stuff, like chatting face-to-face or getting your hands a bit messy in a project. I’m curious, have any of you found cool ways to blend the digital world with the old-school methods in your learning or teaching experiences? What small tweaks could help make the digital-to-in-person transition smoother? Let’s keep this conversation rolling :blush:

i think tech is cool in class but sometimes rough substitution. hands-on play remains vital for real learning. its more about balancing both than letting digital tools rule everything. ignore the gadget hype & focus more on active teaching.